Monday, August 06, 2007

Gemayel Defeat: Beginning of the End of Lebanese Sectarian Politics?

I never was a fan of Hizbullah’s overall strategy for Lebanon or of FPM’s leader with his Napoleonic complex. However, I think that the defeat of Amin Gemayel to a relatively unknown FPM candidate Camille Khoury signals a seismic shift in Lebanese politics. Just think of the setting: an aggrieved father, the scion of one of the most powerful political dynasties in Lebanon, Amin Gemayel, running for the parliamentary seat of his assassinated son in the Maronite heartland of the Metn. In the hereditary politics of the Middle East, the results should have been a forgone conclusion. What went wrong is succinctly summarized in the words of one of the Metn voters. Referring to the Lebanese Forces, he said that they took us for granted.

As my previous postings show, I was in favor of the broad outlines of Lebanon’s Cedar revolution. I was however disturbed by the hijacking of these ideals by the unholy alliance that came together to form the March 14 group. On local politics, they advocated the status quo; that is preserving the power and economic privilege of the well-heeled and the well-connected and did nothing to curb the influence of traditional feudal families. Most destructive, however, has been their single-minded, obsessive and very public anti-Syrian stance. That is not to say that the Syrian regime in not culpable for some if not many of what they are accused of, but having your whole political platform be consumed by a vendetta against Syria does nothing for the problems your constituents are facing.

As the gap between rich and poor grew in the post civil war years, the Lebanese middle class was eviscerated. The previously privileged Maronite middle class perhaps lost most of all. I was shocked in recent years, on seeing how decrepit some of the inner neighborhoods of the Northern Christian suburbs of Beirut have become. In fact they came to resemble some of the areas of the Dahiyeh. Is it any wonder, that the underprivileged among the Christians came to identify more with the populist politics of FPM and Hizbullah than with the tired rhetoric of the Lebanese Forces. It is very telling that the voters of the Metn were willing to break with a party that had been seen as the traditional defenders of the sect.

Whether the net outcome of this election will be positive or not is impossible for me to say. However, the fact that voters broke with their sectarian impulse to vote for Gemayel just because he was a Gemayel, is an important and positive development.

5 comments:

Yazan said...

hat-tip abu kareem, i couldnt have said it better myself.

The word is "hijacked" exactly.

Maysaloon said...

I disagree Abu Kareem. I think Gemayel shot himself in the foot by confusing the mass sympathy for the death of his son with popular support. Not only was he seen to be capitalising on his son's death, but a former President is insulted by losing an election for a seat as an MP no less. Gemayel is yesterday's man and Bakradoni has essentially broadsided him.

What nobody is asking is, now that Baabda is so close to Aoun, what are his prospects for leading the country? The Lebanese are a people who believe in instant miracles and someone who can keep the money flowing like Hariri. Where will Aoun get this money? The Syrian's and Iranians still don't trust him. America and France hate him, the Saudi's will make sure no money reaches him. So what will he do? Probably be forced to start privatising. So when his government collapses like al Murr's collapsed after Hariri's sacking what will happen?

Hezbullah have played a clever game and stayed out of the government in any shape or form for the time being. Anybody trying to get into this mess will have egg on their face- I'm going to wait and see.

Yazan said...

Wassim,

I agree about Gemayyel, but Aoun....
Dont forget that France was the one that announced Aoun's safety as part of France's Honor... and the same Kouchner was there...

Aoun is not Syria's ally, but he's not a foe anymore.

Although I am not sure that he's the ideal man for the job, but he is, nonethless the least sectarian, and definitely the best out of all this junk that is the lebanese politics... if it was a perfect world, I'd want Nassib Lahoud, but seriously?!...

qunfuz said...

Abu Kareem, I hope you're right. If the Lebanese can get over sectarianism they and the rest of us may just have a chance. Class is obviously much more relevant to power in Lebanon and the region, but the sect dception remains overwhelming. We'll see..

Rabi Tawil (AKA Abu Kareem) said...

Qunfuz,

I am not at all confident that sectarianism is history in Lebanon. Nevertheless, I still think that the results of these elections do indicate a change.